
Ken asks…
Natural pregnancy?
I am planning on getting pregnant sometime in 2008. I REALLY want to have my child with a C section. Can I tell my doctor or do I have to try having the baby the normal way? I want to get a C section because I really don’t want my vagina all stretched out, thats disgusting and way too much pain for me.
Okay excuse me for not knowing that its dangerous for the baby. People are so rude.
Michelle answers:
The way the baby goes in is the way it comes back out ,think about it

Mandy asks…
Women, would you want a natural pregnancy, given the choice?
In the not-so-distant future, it’s probable that women will have the option to have a machine carry a child from conception to “birth”. As I’m sure this method will be rapidly advanced, it will almost certainly be even healthier than natural pregnancy for the fetus, as biological mandates of the parent will no longer limit what is and isn’t available to the fetus.
And, to me, this raises an interesting question. This method will almost certainly be available, but how many women would opt in for it?
So, women… if given the choice to have a healthy machine-based pregnancy instead of a natural pregnancy, what would be your thoughts, considerations, and choice?
In hind’s sight, I guess “machine” was an overly blunt choice of words, as it sounds cold and impersonal for something as sacred as pregnancy. Rather, let’s go with “artificial womb”.
Please no rate downs or rate ups for people answering this question.
Michelle answers:
If is was healthier for the fetus, I’d chose the artificial womb. I understand the whole thing about bonding during the pregnancy, but if the baby would be born healthier, I’d pass it up. I’d feel awful if I cheated my kid out of every advantage he or she deserved.

Richard asks…
How old is too old to have a healthy natural pregnancy?
I’m not talking about in vitro fertilization or any of those things. I’m referring to your standard pregnancy. I hear that after 35, there’s a prohibitive chance of birth defects. I’m not pregnant now, nor will be in the near future, just planning ahead at 31.
Michelle answers:
Statistically, chances of birth defects increase around the age of 35, and then again after 40, and so on. But that’s not to say that you’re destined to have a bad pregnancy or unhealthy child at that age.
I think your own genetics and lifestyle plays more of a role than just your age. After all, if you turn 35, but have “the body of a 29-year-old” are your chances of having a baby with birth defects better or worse?

Mary asks…
Have you had a natural pregnancy after previous round of clomid?
I was prescribed clomid and got pregnant with my daughter on the first try. Now it has been 2 years and I have been ovulating normally, without any clomid. Are there any side effects to having previously taken clomid? Will I need to go on it again to get pregnant?
Michelle answers:
There shouldn’t be side effects for having taken the clomid before, if you’re ovulating on your own, there might not be a need for Clomid now, but only a doctor can tell you for sure, you can ask a fertility specialist online for free for advice as well, try www.FertilityTies.com
good luck!!
Powered by Yahoo! Answers