Your Questions About Natural Ivf

Thomas asks…

Has anyone with endometriosis had sucess getting pregnant after they tried accupuncture?

I have been ttc off and on for about 6 years now with no sucess. I dont have 20 grand just hanging out to pay for IVF so I wanted to try some natural solutions first. I heard some people have sucess after trying accupuncture so I was just curious about if anyone had any sucess on their own?

Michelle answers:

With prayers nothing is impossible. My wife was attacked with endometriosis 2009 here in Nigeria. After the attack, the doctor advised us to do away with the pregnancy cos it will not make it. He did the operation himself and we relaxed for some weeks say 3-4 before we went back to real action. Real action as in doing it for 13 consecutive days with some days having it twice different styles ie doggy, missionary, sideways, woman on top style. But note, we prayed very well for the pregnancy which came not long afterwards (2 months after). Now, the baby is exactly 1 year old today and my woman is expecting a baby before 25th December 2010. Dont be surprised, the 1 year old is pretty fine. You see, thats the wonders of the world which is very very very easy in the sight of our creator.

Helen asks…

What are the chances of normal conception if BOTH tubes are blocked?

Hi,

I had a HSG done and found that both my tubes are blocked, the doc suggested canulisation (?) or IVF. Can anyone tell me what are the chances of natural conception with blocked tubes, or any other answer is welcome.

Also, does anyone know any alternative medicine for blocked tubes?

Thanks

Michelle answers:

Ok honey! I also have 2 blocked tubes! I did try everything you can to unblock them! I did herbs and all kinda of stuff! I just did IVF and am 14 weeks pregnant! It can happen! But not the old fashion way! It soo hard to be told you can have a baby like everyone else! I know at first i never thought i would be able to afford IVF but i did! We went to Canada! It was a ton cheaper and was fun at the same time!

Email me if you ever need to talk!

Sandy asks…

TTC…IUI?…IVF?…Clomid only?…Prometrium only?…?

I recently had surgery to remove endometriosis. My doctor is now recommending I have more IUIs (I had one prior to surgery) or ultimately IVF. Should we try naturally for awhile? Should we try natural IUI (without stimulation from gonaditropins)? Is IVF the next step instead of wasting money on smaller proceedures first? Please let me know what you are doing/did or any stories you know of. We would have to take money out of our retirement money to do IVF (plus penalties) because we don’t have enough saved. BTW, I just turned 34 and am back in college until August 09, studing to be a surgical technologist (job and clinical apps involve lots of standing). Thanks in advance.

Michelle answers:

It really depends on how desperate you are to concieve if you have the patience wait and try naturally on your own for a couple months for any intervention. If you have fixed your only obstacle (removing endometriosis) theres a good chance you might concieve naturally straight away. (you won’t know till you try) but on the other hand if after 3-6 months still no success i wouldn’t waste my money on any smaller procedure i would jump straight to the top for ivf as it has the most success of working then any other fertility assistance.

I personally only had 1 iui before moving onto ivf, actually starting my 1st cycle this week, so i can’t give you a positve story yet, but statistically iui was 10% chance of working 1st time for us and ivf has 60% chance of working.

So my partner and i are opting for the better success rate for us.

I wish you lots of luck and hope you get that bfp soon.

Laura asks…

Do you find it interesting that feminists deny the relationship?

Feminists seems to ignore that fact that women’s current economic freedom is primarily due to their reproductive freedom.

But to understand the truth you must examine what is natural, women’s reproductive freedom is artificially constructed. Birth control, abortion and IVF are all artificial, they are unnatural. They are obviously necessary for women’s “reproductive rights” as feminists like to all them, but they are ARTIFICIAL.

This means that the so called “super woman” image feminists have been selling to the word is fake. Women’s natural biology conspires against feminists aims, if you remove the artificial variables from the situation (no birth control pill, abortion, IVF, Govt subsidizing single motherhood)
women’s lib would have little to know influence.

With the removal of all artificial variables, in the natural world women would be unable to compete against men, unless they planned on staying a virgin until they are ready to have kids. I can’t imagine a single woman who would stay a virgin that long.

That means under natural circumstances women would get pregnant in their late teens or early twenties without birth control and contraceptives, women are at a natural disadvantage, nature made it that way.

Feminists seem to get around this by saying “gender is a social construct” because they know women’s own biology under natural circumstances conspires against them and women as a group define their primary value in life by being a mother.

Feminists hate this the most because you can’t be at two places at once, you either choose to be a good mother or a good business person, you can’t have both.
How many women would put of sex, could they wait till their late twenties like they do know to have kids. I doubt it, they would get pregnant young and never get a chance at a career.
Natural means the removal of artificial variables.
Daycare is not a natural variable.
Yakuza Lady, if a woamns only goal in life is to be a mother then it’s not a disadvantage, if the want’s to be a business person and a mother at the same time. It IS as disadvantage.
womans not woamns
Spanx your statement does not disprove my point.

Michelle answers:

Feminism is one of the moist psychotic cults in history

Powered by Yahoo! Answers