Your Questions About Natural Infertility Treatments

David asks…

I’m in critical situation pls help me?

I’m in clomid for 2 phases that is 50mg and 100 mg after that my doctor told me to consult a fertility doctor…Do i really have no chances to conceive by natural method ? What infertilty doctor’s will do if i go for treatment…I’m very much blank and no idea regarding this from my family members.

I really don’t know what they will do…and how long will it take to conceive if i go for a fertility doctor ? What are the ways and chances and kinds of treatment they will give for infertility ?

Pls give me ur valuable answers…me and my man really need a baby.
Clomid doesn’t works for me

Michelle answers:

I did not respond to smaller doses of clomid, it took 150 mg for me to start ovulating. One cycle on each is not enough determination on if it will work or not. My specialist had me on each level for three cycles. It was the second cycle of 150 that I conceived on. Don’t give up hope so soon. The fertility doctor may have a different approach from your regular doctor. They may do more cycles of clomid alone or may put you on a combination such as clomid and metiformin. They may run more tests to determine the cause of infertility.

As far as how long it will take you, that is not anything anyone here can truly answer. Each woman’s body is different and each pregnancy is different. It might take one month, it might take one year, or it might not ever happen. It is the sad reality that many couples face. Just try and take it day by day and week by week.

Good luck. I hope that everything works out.

Jenny asks…

What do you think of these comments by prospective adopters?

We suffer from infertility but were lucky to have had our son naturally (little miracle!)

I post on an infertility website on which many members have given up on fertility treatment and are “moving on” to adoption.

Some of the comments they have made make me feel really ill. I’ve read birth mothers being referred to as “chav b*tches” and how the APs want to change the child’s name “because that chavvy b*tch who gave birth to him chose it” and they want something “more middle class”.

One was bewailing the fact that her “stupid” Social Worker wouldn’t let her change the name of a 2 year old boy so that she could use “the name I dreamed of giving my own child if I’d ever had one – it breaks my heart that I’ll never use it!”.

They refer to birth mothers as “tummy mummies” (ie belitting) and talk about how they worry that this EVIL “TM” will one day come into THEIR child’s life and how they can prevent this.

And Heaven help us if a vulnerable mother sorts herself out and wins back custody of the child that these PAPs are fostering! The bile, hatred and fury they spew is unbeleivable (never any scrap of happiness that the child is going back to his natural family)! I have felt quite ill reading it.

And these are all people who have been approved for adoption! (I live in the UK). I know infertility hurts and can make you bitter but I find this upsetting.

I have no been through the adoption process myself, it was something I was considering perhaps we would do ourselves one day if our efforts to conceive #2 are unsuccessful, but after researching it I have become so totally disgusted by the whole thing that I have decided against it. Surely not all adoptive parents are like this? How do they get approved to adopt with attitudes like this? Is it because they have more money/stability than the families from which the child has been taken and are therefore seen as “more deserving”?

Surely these attitudes can’t be good for the child? I feel really disturbed by it all . . .
The other thing that worries me is that several of them admit they are lying to their social workers and having “sneaky” tries at IVF whilst waiting for adoption. They really want their own kids and are treating adoption as an “Oh well if the IVF fails its a last resort” kind of thing. Surely this is wrong. I think they are not good people.
One even said that she and her husb decided against a particular child because they thought his name was “horrid and chavvy” and the social worker wouldn’t let them change it. She said “There was no way in hell I would want to shout THAT in a playground” this was accompanied by lots of snobbish jokes about how “trashy, rough” people give their kids “horrible ” names . . .

Michelle answers:

I am both an adoptive parent and an adoptee. My husband & I adopted as our first choice – our children are not a ‘back-up’ option for us – never were.

That said, at our preparing to adopt courses, we were the only couple who had not undergone IVF, and the level of desperation to have a child at any cost was both sad &, just sometimes, alarming. I would agree that most of the PAPs I met were very middle class with large disposable incomes, but some obviously had thought through the process and had the ability to love a child they had not given birth too, one couple I felt had real issues – I would have to say that I felt Social Services could see that too.

We were definitely treated with suspicion by Social Services – after our initial appointment we were told we had to wait at least a year to see ‘if we were being serious and were committed’, purely because adoption was our first choice for parenting.

For the record, my children kept the names they were given by their birth mum (although my daughter wanted to change hers – and now she is 20, she introduces herself as a variable of her given name) but we discussed them having one of our family first names as a middle name, which they decided they would like. If they hadn’t wanted to that would’ve been fine too.

I don’t think the system is perfect by any means, I also think it is very prone to the vagaries of fashion and poor research but we don’t live in a perfect world, otherwise those children wouldn’t be seeking homes in the first place.

Maria asks…

Marijuana the cancer cure, why is it being kept from us?

Hemp Oil medication to cure a lot of pain full and devastating disease. Rick Simpson is a Pioneer in making this treatment available.

Rick Simpson Run from the Cure.

The process is considered illegal due to the content it contains Marijuana.

The whole process can be made at home as he claims, it is the T.H.C that is the ingredient that can cure loads of problems. This is a 100% natural cure, with no side effects unlike Pharmaceutical drugs that can cause damaging side effects like addiction, insomnia, etc etc.

It is not used because there is no profit in curing things like Cancer. every person who has a problem a profit is made not to cure but to keep the money flowing.

If Marijuana was so bad (as the Governments and health service claim) why are people aloud to be exposed to chemicals that are proved to be more harmful, we use in our everyday life from cleaning products at home to the food we eat.

What do you think, is it right to keep something that is natural and effective from the public?

I have had personal experience, i had to watch while my partner with cancer got worse while receiving treatment. He nearly died with it and the side effects where unbelievable scary and pain full.

Check it out on YouTube he has 7 Videos or go to Phoenixtears web page to see for your self (Don’t know how to make a LINK)

I got diagnosed with a condition which the NHS only offered the pill to ease my condition. PCOS is a condition which means i have cysts on my overies which leads to hormone imbalance, very intence pain, infertility, uncontroling moods and unable to control weight etc I suffered for years with no diagnosis, GPs passing me off as just having bad periods. It was the herbalist that gave me advise and lead to getting properly diagnosed.

I went a herbalist which the NHS staff frowned on, did not believe it would do anything. Her treatment is very effective it has changed my life, but i have to pay for this life changing medication. It won’t cure it as it is not curable but manages it greatly by using Herbs.

Hebalists do not get enough credit.
This is my question: What do you think, is it right to keep something that is natural and effective from the public?

If you read it and had a look at the web sites, you can not overdose. People are so brain washed by Pharmacitical companys.
If anyone is going to coment PLEASE have a look at the web sites before making a comment.

It is HEMP OIL which you only take a rice size amount. When you say overdose your link relates it to drink and it states the same effects as someone drinking too much.

This question is aimed for people who are suffering from cancer or other diseases, who have had bad experiance with NHS treatment
I watched my partner go through chemo and the effects that it had on him where frightening, in no relation to the effects of Marijuana. The report does suggest that THC from selected strains and processed to exract the hemp oil is effective to help the good cells and make the cancer cells dorment. Chemo is the oppisite and kills off all how is someone supposed to recover from that. When you see the effects of the treatment, when only a few months before he looked so normal. This possibility is appealing and hopefull.

I have health problems which have been handled by herbs from a herbalist where the NHS could not offer me anything what does that tell you about conventional medacine.

Michelle answers:

I think it is a great shame that people in this country can not reap the benefits of a natural and safe herb for pain management.

And although I think it should be legal to everyone to do as they wish, it at least needs to be legal for those who need it most.

From what I’ve learned, there was a big deal back in the 1930s (Harry J Anslinger?) and a bunch of anti-marijuana propaganda that’s still making it’s rounds today. It was made illegal on a stupid, unscientific basis anyway.

Charles asks…

why is weed illegal? its perfectly safe. FACTS PROVEN. read them.?

its not a sin? While The Bible doesn’t name it, it DOES say we are to put only natural things into our bodies and marijuana is a totally natural herb that until made illegal, was used by many cultures in many ways for it’s healing ability. (Smoked, drank as tea, used in cooking.) And those ancient people lived long, healthy lives.also,There is no convincing scientific evidence that marijuana causes psychological damage or mental illness in either teenagers or adults. Most people who smoke marijuana smoke it only occasionally. A small minority of Americans – less than 1 percent – smoke marijuana on a daily basis. An even smaller minority develop a dependence on marijuana. Some people who smoke marijuana heavily and frequently stop without difficulty. Others seek help from drug treatment professionals. Marijuana does not cause physical dependence. If people experience withdrawal symptoms at all, they are remarkably mild. if it was legal more people would be out of jail leaveing are prisons open for more deadly crimminals,Marijuana arrests in the United States doubled between 1991 and 1995. In 1995, more than one-half-million people were arrested for marijuana offenses. Eighty-six percent of them were arrested for marijuana possession. Tens of thousands of people are now in prison for marijuana offenses. An even greater number are punished with probation, fines, and civil sanctions, including having their property seized, their driver’s license revoked, and their employment terminated. Despite these civil and criminal sanctions, marijuana continues to be readily available and widely used.
Moderate smoking of marijuana appears to pose minimal danger to the lungs. Like tobacco smoke, marijuana smoke contains a number of irritants and carcinogens. But marijuana users typically smoke much less often than tobacco smokers, and over time, inhale much less smoke. As a result, the risk of serious lung damage should be lower in marijuana smokers. There have been no reports of lung cancer related solely to marijuana,MEDICAL:Marijuana has been shown to be effective in reducing the nausea induced by cancer chemotherapy, stimulating appetite in AIDS patients, and reducing intraocular pressure in people with glaucoma. There is also appreciable evidence that marijuana reduces muscle spasticity in patients with neurological disorders. GATE WAY DRUG?:Marijuana does not cause people to use hard drugs. What the gateway theory presents as a causal explanation is a statistic association between common and uncommon drugs, an association that changes over time as different drugs increase and decrease in prevalence. Marijuana is the most popular illegal drug in the United States today. Therefore, people who have used less popular drugs such as heroin, cocaine, and LSD, are likely to have also used marijuana. Most marijuana users never use any other illegal drug. Indeed, for the large majority of people, marijuana is a terminus rather than a gateway drug. causes crime? umm no, Every serious scholar and government commission examining the relationship between marijuana use and crime has reached the same conclusion: marijuana does not cause crime. The vast majority of marijuana users do not commit crimes other than the crime of possessing marijuana. Among marijuana users who do commit crimes, marijuana plays no causal role. Almost all human and animal studies show that marijuana decreases rather than increases aggression. INCREASED PREGNANCY?There is no evidence that marijuana causes infertility in men or women. In animal studies, high doses of THC diminish the production of some sex hormones and can impair reproduction. However, most studies of humans have found that marijuana has no impact of sex hormones. In those studies showing an impact, it is modest, temporary, and of no apparent consequence for reproduction. There is no scientific evidence that marijuana delays adolescent sexual development, has feminizing effect on males, or a masculinizing effect on females. CAR ACCIDENTS?:There is no compelling evidence that marijuana contributes substantially to traffic accidents and fatalities. At some doses, marijuana affects perception and psychomotor performances- changes which could impair driving ability. However, in driving studies, marijuana produces little or no car-handling impairment- consistently less than produced by low moderate doses of alcohol and many legal medications. In contrast to alcohol, which tends to increase risky driving practices, marijuana tends to make subjects more cautious. Surveys of fatally injured drivers show that when THC is detected in the blood, alcohol is almost always detected as well. For some individuals, marijuana may play a role in bad driving. The overall rate of highway accidents appears not to be significantly affected by marijuana’s widespread use in society. OVER DOSE: Marijuana does not cause serious health problems like those caused by tobacco or alcohol (e.g., strong addic

Michelle answers:

Because the US is already the fattest, the stupidest, and the most wasteful country. Even though everyone knows weed is perfectly safe, we’re all just afraid of looking bad and adding “stoners” to our list of negative stereotypes.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers