Mark asks…
Is this why Muslims and liberals hate Fox News?
3/23/12 breitbart.com: “In the final six months of his life, Osama bin Laden received a 21-page letter from his media advisor, U.S.-born jihadist Adam Gadahn, that lamented the firing of MSNBC host Keith Olbermann and wished death upon Fox News”
Michelle answers:
Liberals hate Fox News because it tells the truth, and is not part of Obama’s re-election campaign, like CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and MSNBC are. Liberals are terrified when people have an opportunity to hear the truth. That is why they want to outlaw talk radio.
Muslims hate Fox News because they want to take advantage of the liberals being apologists for the muslims. This helps the muslims in their effort to destroy the US from the inside, without firing a shot. The Fox News audience is made perfectly aware of what the muslims are trying to do, and why winning the war on terror is vital to our survival. This means that more and more people are vigilant in keeping a close eye on muslims and their activities. If the liberals had their way, we would never discover these terrorist bomb plots before they are put into action. And this is exactly what the muslims want.
Chris asks…
Did you see Ron Paul on Greenspan? (On Fox?)?
http://libertymaven.com/2008/10/23/ron-paul-on-fox-greenspan-should-go-back-to-writing-letters-about-ayn-rand/2737/
And did you know he just was qualified by supporters to be a write in candidate in CA as well as the other states he can be voted for in?
Folks, this is Fox Business, with Cavuto, not Hannity.
Michelle answers:
THe problem is that no one wants to see bad times ever. The public won’t tolerate it anymore. I pound my heads talking to a few Democrats the last few months. They keep using the word recession as if it was the end of the world. I reminded them of what the recessions were like in the past, and they would say it wasn’t that bad or it was far worse then than it is now. I also remind them of their High school education and they kind of quiet down a bit. Because the government has reduce the number of recessions, our youth don’t remember. They are even more afraid of the word. A coworker wants told me a long time ago that a country runs better under a good dictator. The problem is who often do we have a good one. The Fed is like any other people and most would prevent the recession to look good. Our country would do well if we have a good man was running the Fed but it’s unlikely to find one and we seem to be better off with natural fluctuation then relying on a man with selfish desires.
PS, Ron Paul is not the only one warning of the problems of Alan Greenspan. A lot of Economist has criticized him of being slow to react. They said it with the internet bubble, hedge fund and also mortgage regulation. People who keep up with the news and have their minds open should not be shocked at the problem. They may be shocked at the depth, but it was warned that this was going to happen. Greed has kepts us from seeing the truth. I keep refering to people of the internet bubble where the head of SUN , Apple and Microsoft all warn of a crash a year before it happened, and people ignored them and screamed fowl play when it did.
Helen asks…
Did you see Chris Wallace of Fox News reprimand & take to task the bigoted Fox & Friends cast yesterday morn?
It was fabulous! I am not a Fox News contributer by any means—-meaning, I just don’t appreciate them much because I do find their programming is very bias and bigoted in nature, but yesterday morning as I was flipping thru the channels, I came across an interesting segment.
It was Chris Wallace of “Fox News Sunday Morning” who was to do a segment on another issue, but wound up admonishing and butt good!!—the Fox and Friends bigoted crew. He did not appreciate the constant bashing by them of Obama on his speech about race and “typical white person”. Check this out for yourselves. I was like wow! I am a Chris Wallace fan from now on!
http://thebivouac.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/chris-wallace-takes-fox-friends-to-task/
Weigh in good and decent citizens.
CORRECTION: It was March 21, not yesterday. Nonetheless, it was unbelieveably delicious!
Michelle answers:
That’s the same question I’ve been asking myself for so long. It seems that people only portray negative stuff on Obama, and tend not to focus on the issues facing Clinton and McCain. I’m watching Fox News for some time and it’s getting ridiculous! From Obama being the rockstar to this UNNECESSARY Rev. Wright issue. It’s not because I’m black I’m supporting Obama, I was actually feeling sorry for McCain but I don’t think he’s bringing the issues effectively. He’s like Bush’s little pet dog. He’s passing through this election with ease. He sitting on thrones in Isarel and seems to think he’s the president already. As for Clinton, she only tends to criticize Obama, but fail to bring the important issues up front. In my opinion, she doesn’t seem realistic about this Presidency. However, Obama to me is doing well. The way he brings the issues is well educated and informing. He seems not to criticize his opposers which is really brave. And to top it off, he’s doing quite well. PEOPLE SAY THINGS ABOUT OBAMA BUT THEY DON’T HAVE STRONG POINTS TO BACK IT UP…..WHILE CLINTON AND MCCAIN IS GETTING AWAY BECAUSE OF THEIR COLOUR. IN THIS WORLD LET US PUT ASIDE RACE BECAUSE IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT WE NEED ONE ANOTHER!
Robert asks…
Is Fox (Faux) News really reporting fair and balanced about all their subject matter?
Does Faux News (I hope I spelled it right. I don’t watch it much so forgive my spelling if I got it wrong, eh) really and truly encompass the most moral and righteous reporters who in turn report only the truth — fair and balanced? I ask because I recently stumbled across some very telling circumstances & feel that everyone has a right to know…to weigh in.
Are Faux News reporters really genuine and the epidome of holding themselves morally upright in their practice of “what journalism should really be”. Or, is it just a network to spew hate and smear esp. against Obama over the past few months and then some throughout this campaign process?
Chris Wallace takes Faux News to Task (Chris Wallace is a Fox Reporter):
http://thebivouac.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/chris-wallace-takes-fox-friends-to-task/
I then ran across this rather bizarre article that Bill O’Reilley really wanted hush hush & fast:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris2.html
Please weigh in. TY
I found this recent mess, a hot mess to say the least:
Culture Warrior: Smoking Gun did not alter the court papers, the lawsuit filed against Bill O’Reilly that is currently on file with the Supreme Court with The State of New York. All Smoking Gun did was scan it and insert it on their website. It’s all there and filed with the court, so yes. I do rely on Smoking Gun for this matter because they scanned the lawsuit and put it on their website. If you want further proof you can go online to the NY Supreme Court Website or visit their office in person. IT’S ALL THERE. End of story.
Rachel: Very telling article and much appreciated. I find it wholeheartedly candid and most true. I knew that, but to see that there was some research done on it helps confirm my suspicion and conviction about Faux News. Thank you.
For those of you stating that I NEED TO WATCH IT MYSELF, I have! I am proud to say that I am no longer a Faux News viewer. Per the links I provided, those are only horrific examples of their most bias, extreme right-wing and racist, most abusive views, esp. when it comes to reporting on Obama.
Hannity is always new with a hatchet job, but does he not realize that Obama prevails every time he slanders Obama, or brings up some non-significant smeart job. Hannity is not doing any favors for McShame or Hitlery. He helps Obama whenever his reporting (which is always) becomes unfair, hatemongering, slanderous and most unbalanced.
Thank you fool Hannity and assinine Faux News. You have lost me as a viewer permanently.
PonPon: I am so ROFL!! That is precisely why I do not watch Faux News any longer, for that reason there that you stated: unfair and unbalanced to say the least. What a great scenerio and example of exactly my point, but you saw it with your own eyes. Thank you!
APPARENTLY FAUX NEWS SUPPORTERS ARE NOT READING MY FULL POST AS YOU CAN TELL FROM THEIR ANSWERS.
Slightly Dark Frank: I understand that Faux News is just that “fake”. It is and was to fill a void in the “media entertainment” only hole. They did that and are making money, but fair and balanced, you and most intelligent people know they are not.
As far as bringing up the sex scandal with Bill O’Reilly, he holds himself as the number one highest of moral stature on TV and as a high moral media outlet such as “Fox (Faux) News”. Bill O’Whiney is nothing in comparison to high morals; he’s just another imperfect man drawing attention to his blabber and prejudice rant to “get ratings”. That’s all. I remember him in his humble days in Portland, Oregon. Oregon is a sucky state for sure; just look who they produced.
Bill, Hannity (Calamity) and Faux News is a huge embarrassment to ethical journalism.
Michelle answers:
Ah Fox news.. The Jerry Springer of network news.
I liken Fox news to that old, cheesy theme restaurant that’s way overpriced with too much atmosphere.. And bad food.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers